Legal Opinion

Butrum v. Roman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 8, 2004No. 84A04-0308-JV-389Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge.

On February 24, 2004, this Court issued an opinion in Butrum v. Roman, 803 N.E.2d 1139 (Ind.Ct.App.2004), in which we affirmed the trial court's ruling that the parties' eighteen-year-old daughter, H.B., was not emancipated. Thereafter, the attorney for Appellant Jeffrey O. Butrum, John A. Kesler II, filed a petition for rehearing with this Court. For the reasons stated below, we deny rehearing and strike the brief pursuant to Indiana Appellate Rule 42.

A rehearing petition "shall state concisely the reasons the party believes rehearing is necessary." Ind. Appellate Rule…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Butrum v. RomanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. In Re WilkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API