Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Quinker

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 1, 1859PublishedCited by 5 opinions

CASE 60 — PETITION EQUITY — APTEAL PROit LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT. cited Civil Code, sec. 228, sub-div., 3 ; lb., secs. 474, 475, 476 ; 17 B. Mon., 324; lb., 542; Samuel vs. Dallam, MS. opin., January, 1857. cited Civil Code, secs. 474, 475, 476, 477; 9 B. Mon., 231; 7 lb., 116,314; 11 lb., 310, 318; 2 lb., 470; 3 lb., 116; 6 lb., 130; 2 Marsh., 40; 3 Marsh., 350.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE STITES

delivered the omnion of tiie court;

Quinker obtained a judgment at law against Armstrong, upon which an execution was issued, directed to the county in which the judgment was rendered, and returned “ no property found.” He then filed his petition in equity, setting forth his judgment and the return, and obtained against Armstrong a general attachment, which was, on the 4th March, 1857, levied upon a lot of ground in Louisville belonging to Armstrong, and, on the 11th of the same month, served upon Armstrong in person.

On the 14th April, 1857, Armstrong sold the lot to Lewis, who…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stachely v. PeirceTexas Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Allen v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1863
  3. Tuell v. Inhabitants of MarionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1913
  4. Singer Sewing MacHine Co. v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
  5. Bowker v. ChildsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1862

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API