Legal Opinion

Lambrakis v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 20, 1924PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArthur, C. J.

— I. Leoleos, plaintiff’s intestate, was employed by Hubinger Bros. Company, proprietors of a cereal plant in Keokuk, Iowa. An industry track, a spur from the Burlington railroad, enters the yards of the piaixt irom the east, ana runs practically straight east and west between two large buildings of the plant. This track is used by Hubinger Bros. Company to bring coal to the plant. Under the track,, between the buildings, is a hopper for the reception of *642coal. From the hopper the coal is conveyed to the boiler house on the north side of the track. Cars of coal brought into the plant were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baker v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  2. Dillon v. Iowa Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. Brown v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  4. Martensen v. C., R. I. & P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  5. Haggerty v. Chicago, St. Paul & Kansas City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mast v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1948
  2. Jones v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Lingle v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  4. Reasoner v. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  5. Disalvo v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API