Legal Opinion

Estes v. North Carolina State University

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 1, 1988No. 8710IC558PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

The State contends that plaintiff made an election of remedies in choosing to receive payment for his accumulated sick and vacation leave in lieu of workers’ compensation benefits and that the Commission erred in awarding plaintiff workers’ compensation disability benefits. We disagree.

G.S. 97-6 provides that:

[n]o contract or agreement, written or implied, no rule, regulation, or other device shall in any manner operate to relieve an employer in whole or in part, of any obligation created by this Article, except as herein otherwise expressly provided..

G.S. 97-6. G.S. 97-7…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wood v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Moretz v. Richards & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Petty v. Associated Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. Foster v. Western-Electric Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Ashe v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Estes v. N.C. State UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  2. Estes v. North Carolina State UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Lowe v. BE&K Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. North Carolina Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  5. Davis v. City of New BernNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API