Legal Opinion

Cheuk Fung S-Yong v. Holder

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 9, 2010No. 07-70619PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Opinion filed on August 25, 2009, and appearing at 578 F.3d 1169 (9th Cir.2009), is amended as follows:

At page 1174, at the end of the paragraph that reads “We have previously found that California law regulates the possession and sale of many substances ..., and we must look further to demonstrate whether Yong’s conviction renders him removable!,]” footnote “5” is inserted. The text of the footnote reads:

5 Although it is not entirely clear from our current precedents when the modified categorical approach may be employed if the particular statute is broader than the generic offense,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Naji Antoine Tokatly v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Estrada-Espinoza v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Maria Huerta-Guevara v. John D. Ashcroft, U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Coronado v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Jose Medina-Lara v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Luis Juarez Alvarado v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. Leal-VegaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Ramiro Enrique Rojas v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API