Legal Opinion

Churchill v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided September 26, 2012No. CA 12-310PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge.

|, Andrea and Daniel Churchill appeal from the trial court’s decision that their two children, R.C. (DOB 1-12-08) and E.C. (DOB 5-7-11), are dependent-neglected. They challenge the sufficiency of the evidence supporting that decision. We affirm.

According to the affidavit of facts supporting the petition for emergency custody and dependency-neglect, on July 5, 2011, Andrea took E.C., the younger of the two children, to see Dr. Robin Williams because the child had been vomiting. As a result of the doctor’s examination, E.C. was determined to have lost weight since his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arazola v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. & Minor ChildCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
  2. Minor Children v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API