State of Arizona v. Stephen Jay Malone Jr
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE TIMMER, opinion of the Court:
¶1 Although a defendant cannot use evidence of a mental disease or defect to show he did not form a crime's requisite mental state (mens rea), see State v. Mott , 187 Ariz. 536 , 541, 931 P.2d 1046 , 1051 (1997) ; State v. Schantz , 98 Ariz. 200 , 212-13, 403 P.2d 521 , 529-30 (1965), he may use evidence of a character trait for impulsivity to cast doubt on the existence of premeditation, see State v. Christensen , 129 Ariz. 32 , 35, 628 P.2d 580 , 583 (1981), which forms part of the mens rea for first degree murder under A.R.S. § 13-1105(A)(1), see State…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Clark v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. Pohlot, StephenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- State v. SchantzArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. MottArizona Supreme Court · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carlos Cruz v. Hon. blair/state of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2023
- Ernest Joseph Longhini, III v. Ryan Thornell, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026
- James D. Shaw, a/k/a Roscoe James Shaw v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2024
- State of Arizona v. James Murray Reaves, IIICourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2022