Panunzio v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims which dismissed the claim herein upon the merits, after trial. The claim is for damages arising out of the death of appellant’s intestate, a boy of twelve years, who on June 2,1935, fell into the Barge Canal from a platform or “ catwalk ” attached to Movable Dam No. 7, located at or near Amsterdam, New York. Movable Dam No. 7 was constructed and operated by the State as part of its canal system, its function being to create, maintain and regulate suitable water levels in the canal section of the Mohawk River, westerly thereof. This…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Vaughan v. . Transit Development Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Mendelowitz v. NeisnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Morse v. Buffalo Tank Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Sterger v. . Van SicklenNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Fox v. . Warner-Quinlan Asphalt Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sher v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1949
- Pendino v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1949
- McCann v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Ryan v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1958
- Piche v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.