Legal Opinion
Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Phifer
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 20, 1994No. 2 CA-CV 94-0270PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LACAGNINA, Judge.
On April 22, 1994, Citibank filed a notice of filing foreign judgment with the Clerk of the Pima County Superior Court. The judgment had been obtained in the United States District Court for the District of California on January 17, 1990. The trial court denied a motion by defendant Jim Phifer to vacate the filing of the foreign judgment, holding that A.R.S. § 12-1551, the five-year statute of limitations governing actions on domestic judgments, applied rather than A.R.S. § 12-544(3), the four-year statute of limitations governing the enforcement of foreign judgments.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jones v. RoachCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Eschenhagen v. ZikaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
3Cited by12 opinions
- Revolution Portfolio, LLC v. BealeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Le Credit Lyonnais, SA v. NaddDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Gaughan v. First Community BankDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2014
- Logemann Holding, Inc. v. LieberAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- Funding Metrics v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.