Legal Opinion

State v. Hutto

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 11, 1983No. 21921PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was indicted for breach of trust with a fraudulent intention. After the presentation of the State’s case, the trial judge dismissed the indictment on the ground the evidence did not sufficiently comply with the indictment to justify submission of the case to the jury. The State appeals from this order.

Appellant argues that the trial judge erred in finding that the evidence did not sustain the charge in the indictment. The record before this Court does not contain any trial testimony. The statement of the case presents the only evidentiary facts in the record, and that presentation…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. GoreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. WinestockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  2. State v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  3. State v. McGowanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. KnightonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API