Legal Opinion

Wardlaw v. Mayer, Son & Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 21, 1886PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Attorney and Client. Money Rule. Mortgages. Evidence. Equity. Contracts. Practice in Supreme Court. Before Judge Branham. Floyd Superior Court. March. Adjourned Term, 1886. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Justice.

The plaintiffs, who were merchants residing in Cincinnati, sold to the defendant, carrying on business in Rome, Georgia, liquors, cigars, etc., on credit, to stock his barroom, and at the time of the sale, it was agreed between, them that he should execute and deliver to them a mortgage, not only on that stock of goods in bulk, but upon other goods purchased from time to time to keep it up, as well as upon bar-fixtures and furniture, and that Max Meyerhardt, Esq., a lawyer at Rome, should prepare and attend to the execution of the mortgage. Mr. Meyerhardt not only drew, but as a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wall v. ArringtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Long v. GilbertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Jones v. HowardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  3. Central Union Trust Co. v. Appalachian Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1924
  4. W. L. Schautz Co. v. Duncan Hosiery Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  5. Robinson, Norton & Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API