National Automobile & Casualty Insurance v. Mt. Pitt Co.
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
KILKENNY, District Judge.
Plaintiff, in this diversity action, demands judgment against defendant on an indemnity agreement. Plaintiff is referred to as National, the defendant as Pitt, Cheney Forest Products as Cheney, and Pitt’s foreman as Davis. At all times pertinent to this decision, Pitt was a lessee under Cheney1 of a lath mill and lim*479ited contiguous premises. As part of the lease, Pitt agreed to indemnify Cheney under the provisions set forth in the footnote.2
Cheney’s sawmill operations completely surrounded the lath mill leased by Pitt. Pitt employed from three to five men in its…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. LaymanOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Bedell Et Ux. v. GoulterOregon Supreme Court · 1953
- Alamo Lumber Company v. Warren Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Turner Construction Company v. Belmont Iron WorksDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Yukon Equipment, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Johnson v. Star MacHinery CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Johnson v. Star MacHinery CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Yukon Equipment, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978