Legal Opinion

Lutzken v. City of Rochester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 8, 1959PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoldman, J.

Plaintiff recovered judgment against the defendant City of Rochester on a quantum meruit basis for services rendered in the removal of four tree stumps. This claim was set forth in the second cause of action of plaintiff’s complaint, the first cause of action alleging an express contract having been properly dismissed by reason of a complete failure of proof. Although the record is not clear or conclusive as to any promise made by the city to pay plaintiff for removing the stumps (the city contending that it was a pure demonstration in the hope of securing future business), the Trial Judge…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Seif v. City of Long BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Smith v. . City of NewburghNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  4. Cassella v. City of SchenectadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  5. Brown v. Mount Vernon Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Parsa v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Cable Science Corporation v. Rochdale Village, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  3. Genesco Entertainment, a Div. of Lymutt v. KochDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  4. In Re Lion Capital GroupUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  5. Evans v. City of JohnstownNew York Supreme Court · 1978

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API