Legal Opinion

Chatman v. Millis

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 13, 1975No. 74-139Published

1Opinion of the Court

517 S.W.2d 504 (1975)

Jerry CHATMAN, Appellant,

v.

Willard MILLIS, Jr., Appellee.

No. 74-139.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

January 13, 1975.

Boyett & Morgan, P. A., by Comer Boyett, Jr., Searcy, for appellant.

Pickens, Boyce, McLarty & Watson by James A. McLarty, Newport, for appellee.

HARRIS, Chief Justice.

The question in this case is whether appellee, a psychologist, can be held liable to appellant for malpractice under the facts hereinafter set out. The facts as set forth in appellant's complaint are as follows. Mrs. Robbie Chatman was divorced from her husband, appellant herein. Appellant had…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Carter v. Yardley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API