Legal Opinion

Douglass v. Ullsperger

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 21, 1929No. Gen. No. 32,914PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.

J. N. Douglass and Bret A. Douglass, the payees of a promissory note dated April 2, 1918, brought an action in debt against Anton Ullsperger and Maria Ullsperger, the makers of the note, to recover a balance of $4,059.97, claimed to be due and unpaid. After-wards by leave of court, plaintiffs filed an amended declaration in assumpsit, claiming a balance due upon the note. The jury was withdrawn and the cause submitted to the court. There was a finding in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendants for $3,823.85, judgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Union Mutual Life Insurance v. HanfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Albee v. GrossAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928
  3. Morganroth v. PinkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1922

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Griffin Wellpoint Corp. v. Engelhardt, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. Kazunas v. WrightAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  3. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. NarvidAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931
  4. Binga v. BellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930
  5. Tabero v. SutkowskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API