Legal Opinion

Sealover v. Carey Canada

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 6, 1992No. CV-88-0643PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

McCLURE, District Judge.

BACKGROUND

The court has before it a motion filed October 8, 1992 by defendants United States Gypsum Company (“U.S. Gypsum”), GAF Corporation (“GAF”), and National Gypsum Company (“National Gypsum”), hereafter collectively the “CCR defendants.” 1 The CCR defendants seek a stay of execution of the judgment entered by this court on July 9, 1992 (Record Document No. 282). 2 Judgment was entered jointly and severally against the CCR defendants and their co-defendant, W.R. Grace and Company (“W.R. Grace”), 3 in favor of plaintiff Alma M. Sealover, individually, in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Northern Indiana Public Service Company, an Indiana Corporation v. Carbon County Coal Company, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  2. Joseph Dillon v. City of Chicago, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  3. Luther v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  4. James W. Price v. Franklin Investment Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  5. Tennessee Valley Authority v. Atlas MacHine & Iron Works, Inc. And Williams Enterprises, Inc., in Re Fireman's Fund Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Acevedo-García v. Vera-MonroigCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  2. Acevedo-Garcia v. Vera-MonroigCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  3. STEELWORKERS PENSION TRUST v. THE RENCO GROUP, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API