Legal Opinion

Marcia Fuller French v. Occidental Permian Ltd.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2014No. 12-1002PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hecht

One method of enhanced oil recovery is to inject carbon dioxide (C02) into a reservoir to sweep the oil to the production wells. The C02 returns to the surface entrained in casinghead gas produced with the oil. 1 In this case, royalty owners contend that the royalty due on the casing-head gas under the parties’ agreements must be determined as if the injected C02 were not present, and that they are not required to share with the working interest the expense of removing the C02 from the gas. We disagree and therefore affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. 2

I

A

Petitioners, collectively…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Heritage Resources, Inc. v. NationsBankTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Railroad Com'n of Texas v. Lone Star Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Coastal Oil & Gas Corp. v. Garza Energy TrustTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Exxon Corp. v. MiddletonTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Paradigm Oil, Inc. v. Retamco Operating, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Houston Unlimited, Inc. Metal Processing v. Mel Acres RanchTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company Lp v. Texas Crude Energy, LLC and Amber Harvest, LlcTexas Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. v. HyderTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  4. HighMount Exploration & Production LLC, and Dominion Oklahoma Texas Exploration & Production, Inc. v. Harrison Interests, LTD., Dan J. Harrison III, and BFH Mining LTD.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  5. Marathon Oil v. Mercuria Energy AmericaTexas Business Court · 2025

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API