Legal Opinion

State of Maine v. Jacob A. Hinkel

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 2, 2017No. Docket: Cum-16-150PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJabar, J.

[¶ 1] Jacob A. Hinkel appeals from a judgment entered by the trial court (Cumberland County, Wheeler, J.) after a jury found him guilty of one count of operating under the influence (OUI) with a refusal to submit to a chemical test (Class D), 29-A M.R.S. § 2411(1-A)(C)(2) (2016), and the trial court found him guilty of one count of operating after suspension (Class E), 29-A M.R.S. § 2412-A(1-A)(D) (2016). We affirm the judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶ 2] When the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the State, the jury could have found the following facts beyond a reasonable doubt. See…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. State v. PabonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  3. State v. TaylorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  4. State v. CheneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  5. State of Maine v. Kenneth A. FaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State of Maine v. Jacob A. HinkelSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API