Legal Opinion

Acosta v. Britto

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 11, 2001No. 00-385-APublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This case came before this Court at a session in conference pursuant to Rule 12A(3)(b) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. After reviewing the record and the parties’ memoranda, we proceed to decide the case at this time without further briefing or argument.

The defendant, acting pro se, has appealed from the entry of a Family Court order modifying his child support order. However, the proper procedure to seek review of a decree or order relating to the modification of child support is to petition this court for a writ of certiorari pursuant to G.L.1956 (2000 Reenactment) § 14-1-52(b).…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cok v. CokSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
  2. McKenna v. GugliettoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  3. Lentz v. LentzSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  4. Almeida v. AlmeidaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Codd v. BarrettSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  2. Fischer v. WalkerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API