Legal Opinion

Porter v. Jack's Cookie Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 5, 1962No. 39634PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Judge.

Counsel for both parties have devoted considerable research to the question whether the defendant had the right to cross-examine, without direct examination, a witness who had been called for cross-examination by the plaintiff.

The plaintiff cross-examined the witness under the authority of Code § 38-1801, as amended, Which, in part, provides that either party may make the agent of the other party a witness with the privilege of subjecting him to a thorough and sifting examination and with the further privilege of impeachment as if the witness had testified in his own behalf and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. WestSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Evans v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Carter v. BishopSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  4. Evans v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  5. Sapp v. CallawaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Allen Williams B/n/f Louise J. Smyre v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  2. Hagin v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Melton v. Gilleland & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  4. Grant v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. Gann v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API