Porter v. Jack's Cookie Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Judge.
Counsel for both parties have devoted considerable research to the question whether the defendant had the right to cross-examine, without direct examination, a witness who had been called for cross-examination by the plaintiff.
The plaintiff cross-examined the witness under the authority of Code § 38-1801, as amended, Which, in part, provides that either party may make the agent of the other party a witness with the privilege of subjecting him to a thorough and sifting examination and with the further privilege of impeachment as if the witness had testified in his own behalf and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. WestSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Evans v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Carter v. BishopSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Evans v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Sapp v. CallawaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Allen Williams B/n/f Louise J. Smyre v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Hagin v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Melton v. Gilleland & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Grant v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Gann v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.