Legal Opinion

Hampton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 14, 2000No. 3D99-693PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The appellant, who was the defendant below, filed a “Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence” pursuant to Rule 3.800 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The said motion was filed after the trial court had denied a motion entitled “Motion to Define and Clarify Sentence” in which the appellant argued that the trial court had erred in failing to ensure that he received a sentence of ten (10) years with regard to all (94-7000B, 94-7638, and 94-30870) of his cases, after “corrected sentences” were *1288entered in case numbers 94-7000B and 94-30870 only, in June of 1998.

The State, in addition to…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hampton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API