Legal Opinion

Connolly v. Guardian Casualty Insurance Co. of Buffalo

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 5, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the opinion below for the reasons given by YiceChancellor Fallon in his opinion. We have nothing to add excepting this: We have' examined the contention of the

appellant that “the counsel fee allowed to counsel for the respondent is excessive.” We think it is not. It was $250, and in the circumstances disclosed by the record was quite justified. The respondent is entitled to costs in this court.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Peeskie, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Beekwilder v. BeekwilderNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  2. Coursen v. CoursenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969