Connolly v. Guardian Casualty Insurance Co. of Buffalo
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
We affirm the opinion below for the reasons given by YiceChancellor Fallon in his opinion. We have nothing to add excepting this: We have' examined the contention of the
appellant that “the counsel fee allowed to counsel for the respondent is excessive.” We think it is not. It was $250, and in the circumstances disclosed by the record was quite justified. The respondent is entitled to costs in this court.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Peeskie, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Beekwilder v. BeekwilderNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Coursen v. CoursenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969