Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Kuebler v. Equitable Life Assurance Society

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1996No. Docket 167729Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partO’Connell, J.

I agree with the majority opinion that when a complaint alleges all the necessary elements of fraud as well as malpractice, the statute of limitations governing fraud actions will apply to the fraud count. Brownell v Garber, 199 Mich App 519, 533; 503 NW2d 81 (1993). However, I disagree with the majority’s remedy of reformation of the insurance contract. The antidiscrimination statute, MCL 500.2019; MSA 24.12019, bars reformation of insurance contracts. See Broughton v Dona, 63 AD2d 1101; 406 NYS2d 581 (1978); Key Systems Transit Lines v Pacific Employers Ins Co, 52 Cal 2d 800; 345 P2d 257…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Key System Transit Lines v. Pacific Employers Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Broughton v. DonaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API