Legal Opinion

Cahaney v. O'Brien

New York County Courts

Decided December 21, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHazard, J.

This is in effect a motion for a new trial before the justice; but it has been held that it is necessary in a case like this to take a formal appeal, and that a return be made. (Kellock v. Dickinson, 5 App. Div. 515.)

If we were under the old Code of Civil Procedure, the case would be comparatively simple and clear, as section 3064 provided clearly for just this sort of a case; it provided also that affidavits might be used to show that “ manifest injustice has been done.” Many *801decisions were made under that section, some of which are more or less directly in point here, as, for instance,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kellock v. DickinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  2. Young v. Conklin, New York County Courts1893
  3. Mager v. WuytackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  4. McCall Co. v. UnserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marran's Paint Store, Inc. v. Minarich, New York County Courts1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API