Legal Opinion

Buckley v. Arthur J. Hickey Family Laundry Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 22, 1927PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.

In this action of tort the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff after denial of the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict.

The jury were warranted in finding the following facts: On October 31, 1923, the plaintiff, a boy a few days over five years of age, while playing in a vacant lot, was injured by steam issuing from a pipe, located about two feet, ten inches from the ground, which projected about ten or twelve inches from the side of a laundry building owned and operated by the defendant. This lot was used by the children of the neighborhood as a playground. On the morning of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Altman v. AronsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  2. Burns's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Ayers v. RatsheskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Lynch v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  5. Sullivan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United Electric Light Co. v. Deliso Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. McPheters v. LoomisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  3. Moore v. Worcester Insulation Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  4. Rea v. Checker Taxi Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  5. Falardeau v. Malden & Melrose Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API