Legal Opinion
United States v. Jenkins
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided March 6, 1969No. Crim. A. No. 7027PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NEESE, District Judge.
The defendant Mr. Jenkins was indicted on a charge of possessing in the jurisdiction of this Court certain materials and apparatus, intended for use in violating the federal internal revenue laws. 26 U.S.C. § 5686(a). He entered a plea of not guilty on arraignment. Thereafter, his motion for a bill of particulars was granted. United States v. Haskins, C.A. 6th (1965), 345 F.2d 111, 114 [4]. *198His motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that for him to have complied with the aforecited statute would have required him to incriminate himself…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Frank Roosevelt HaskinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- United States v. Frank Romano, John Ottiano, Edward Romano and Antonio VellucciCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Eddie Earl ArmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. HaskinsDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Turpin v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020