Legal Opinion

Moglia v. Moglia

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 13, 1907PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On bill for partition. On application for order of distribution.

1Opinion of the Court

Emery, V. C.

On reargnment of the question reserved by tire decree in this cause as to the respective rights of the parties in the lands and proceeds of sale, I adhere to the view expressed at the hearing. The substantial question is this: The land partitioned and sold was conveyed in November, 1899, to Peter Moglia, his wife, and their two sons, John and James Moglia, the deed not expressing the interests of the parties, or that the husband and wife held otherwise than as tenants by the entirety. The son John afterwards died, leaving the infant complainants as his heirs-at-law. The claim on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barber v. HarrisNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  2. Miner v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Jooss v. . FeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Johnson v. HartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Asante v. AbbanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API