Legal Opinion

In re Meyers

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 14, 1900PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Bankruptcy. On motion for findings of fact.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, District Judge.

The report of the referee in the above matter in favor of the discharge of Amelia A. Meyers having been confirmed, the opposing creditors have submitted certain statements of fact which they ask the court to find for the purposes of a hearing on appeal.

I am unwilling to introduce a precedent for such a practice, as it is not required by the act of 1898 as respects appeals from the district court to the circuit court of appeals. It would impose additional burdens upon the court, and is not ordinarily essential; since in cases of reasonable doubt, the grounds of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re MeyersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1899
  2. In re HymanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1899

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hardie v. Swafford Bros. Dry Goods Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1908
  2. In re AgnewDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1915
  3. Pittsburgh National Bank v. Dee (In Re Dee)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. In re A. F. Hardie & Co.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1906
  5. In re LevyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API