Legal Opinion
Schleider v. Maryland Casualty Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 19, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The defendant Maryland Casualty Company contends that it is entitled to the sum of $3,500 now held by plaintiff, which was paid to him as attorney for Bertha Horowitz, by way of settlement, release and discontinuance of an action brought by said Bertha Horowitz, as plaintiff, against one Rose B. Pollock, as defendant.
The plaintiff, an attorney, commenced an action on or about June 1, 1925, in the Supreme Court, New York county, on behalf of Bertha Horowitz, to recover damages because of injuries sustained as a result of the negligent operation of an automobile owned by *51Rose B. Pollock. The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hathaway v. . County of DelawareNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
3Cited by5 opinions
- Alliance Assurance Co. v. McNamaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Graphic Arts Mutual Insurance v. MonelloCivil Court of the City of New York · 1963
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of McLaughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Eagle Insurance v. Edgar Sabbeth Plywood & Flooring Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- New York Life Insurance v. GuttenplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940