Legal Opinion

Pivar v. Summit County Sheriff

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 2006No. 23160Published

1Opinion of the Court

Slaby, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Appellant, Gary G. Pivar, appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of appellee, Summit County Sheriff (the “Sheriff’), affirming the Sheriffs denial of Pivar’s application for a concealed-handgun license (“CHL”) pursuant to R.C. 2928.125. We affirm.

{¶ 2} In October 2004, Pivar applied to the Sheriff for a CHL pursuant to R.C. 2923.1210. On November 16, 2004, the Sheriff issued Pivar a Notice of Denial of Pivar’s application because he had retired from the Summit County Sheriffs Office in 1987 on a mental disability. Pivar appealed the Sheriffs decision to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pons v. Ohio State Medical BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Ohio Historical Society v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State ex rel. Celebrezze v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State ex rel. Toledo Edison Co. v. City of ClydeOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Roxane Laboratories, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API