Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Agaronian

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCharles J. Beckinella, J.

This is a motion for reargument. The original motion (which was granted) was for judgment on the pleadings made pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice.

Although the complaint in the action in which the motion was made contains much that could have been omitted without sacrificing anything material, the gravamen of the complaint is clear. Its material allegations relate that on August 9, 1953 Alan Gordon and Rise Gordon were injured through the negligence of Roman A. Agaronian; that when the accident happened Alan Gordon was eight years old and Rise Gordon four; that Mr. Agaronian…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Greenburg v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Joyce v. Washington Storage Warehouse and Van Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  3. Chance v. Guaranty Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Valdimer v. Mount Vernon Hebrew Camps, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. Julian v. Zayre Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API