In re Carrier
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
At Law. Motion to strike off specifications of opposition to discharge of A. F. Baum.
1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.
The first specification filed in opposition to the discharge of A. F. Baum avers that, after he was adjudged a bankrupt, and assignees of his estate were duly chosen, he refused to surrender to the assignees the papers relating to his estate, and concealed from said assignees “certain papers” relating to judgments obtained against him prior to bis adjudication, “the papers” so concealed being a receipt of one Alexander Smith for the notes upon which the judgments were recovered. The bankrupt has moved to strike off this specification, for the reason that it is defective, because it does not…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gibson v. WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Brereton v. HullCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
- In re ButterfieldDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1870
- Chadwick v. StarrettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1847
- In re BurgessDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1870
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.