Legal Opinion

Meyer Lumber Co. v. Trygstad

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1912PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Ward county; Burr, J. Action by the Meyer Lumber Company against Peter Trygstad and others. Erom a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

Plaintiff is a subcontractor who furnished material for the buildings hereinafter mentioned. Trygstad is the contractor, and the defendants Frank and Tompkins were the several owners of the lots and the buildings thereon erected, — Frank owning lots 13 and 14, and Tompkins owning lot 15 adjoining.

The testimony is very long, — the printed abstract containing 1,120 pages, not counting the index, — and prompts us to remind attorneys-that the “law’s delays” are not always chargeable to the courts. For instance, we might also suggest that such matters as newspaper interviews with business men, if…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stoltze v. HurdNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schaffer v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Sheldon v. Chicago Bonding & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  3. Hessinger v. SorensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Robertson Lumber Co. v. ClarkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Meyers Lumber Co. v. TompkinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API