Legal Opinion

The Sterling

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided February 3, 1916No. 3204PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Admiralty. Suit by E. W. Rigney against the gasoline fishing boat Sterling; the humme Bay Packing Company, claimant. On claim of S. P. Starbux, intervening libelant. Decree for respondent.

1Opinion of the Court

NETERER, District Judge.

Intervening libelant alleges, in substance, that the gasoline fishing boat Sterling was being outfitted for a fishing expedition, and that the entire crew, except the master and engineer, were Austrians who had pursued the occupation of fishermen for many years, and that the custom of Austrian fishermen is to be furnished with wines and spirituous liquors, and “that this custom is so ingrained in the Austrian fishermen who have immigrated to this country that even after a number of years it is impossible to induce Austrian fishermen to enter into a contract to engage…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The Robert DollarDistrict Court, D. Washington · 1902
  2. Bovard v. The MayflowerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1889
  3. The SatelliteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1910
  4. Eley v. ShrewsburyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1895
  5. The Plymouth RockDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1874

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. The PennCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1921
  2. Atlantic Steamer Supply Company v. the SS TradewindDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1957
  3. Walker-Skageth Food Stores, Inc. v. BavoisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
  4. The Lord BaltimoreDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API