Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Abramson

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 7, 1904PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Seventh District. Action by Louis Goldstein against Samuel I. Abramson and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtGreenbaum, J.

This action is brought by the plaintiff, the assignee of one Bertha Heilman, for damages claimed to have been sustained by reason of a trespass arising out of the following state of facts: The defendant Abramson was a city marshal, who was directed to levy upon the property of one Louis Heilman, the husband of plaintiff’s assignor and judgment debtor, under a judgment recovered against him in one of the municipal courts. The other defendants were joined as parties by reason of their participation in the alleged unlawful levy. It appears that the marshal called upon two occasions. On the first…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harrington v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Devery v. Winton Motor Carriage Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API