Legal Opinion
Hexter v. Powell
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided December 10, 1971No. 17680PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BATEMAN, Justice.
Our former opinion is withdrawn and the following substituted therefor.
This suit involves the construction of the Hexter Pension Plan and the rights of a former employee of Hexter Title & Abstract Company, Inc. upon the termination of that plan. The appellee Mary W. Powell sued the trustees of the Plan, her employer and Hexter Corporation, successor to Hexter Title & Abstract Company. She also named four other employees as involuntary plaintiffs pursuant to Rule 39. 1 Only two of these, Louise West and Edith P. Frost, appeared and they, together with Mary W. Powell, claimed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brown v. Little, Brown & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Texas Power & Light Co. v. Doering Hotel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
- Republic National Bank & Trust Co. v. BruceTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Langford v. ShamburgerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Texas Power & Light Co. v. Doering Hotel Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Laredo Hides Co., Inc. v. H & H Meat Products Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Exxon Corp. v. Jefferson Land Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Ada Oil Co. v. Dunlop Tire & Rubber Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Laredo Hides Co., Inc. v. H & H Meat Products Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974