Legal Opinion

Katchen v. Wolff & Samson

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 20, 1992PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

258 N.J. Super. 474 (1992)

610 A.2d 415

WILLIAM S. KATCHEN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

WOLFF & SAMSON, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, JOEL A. WOLFF AND DAVID SAMSON, INDIVIDUALLY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued June 8, 1992.

Decided July 20, 1992.

Before Judges BILDER, STERN and KEEFE.

Terry E. Thornton argued the cause for the appellant (Lowenstein, Sandler, Kohl, Fisher & Boylan, attorneys; Zulima V. Farber and Terry E. Thornton, on the brief).

Justin P. Walder argued the cause for the respondents (Walder, Sondak, Berkeley & Brogan, attorneys).

The opinion…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jacob v. Norris, McLaughlin & MarcusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. Noye v. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
  3. Jacob v. Norris, McLaughlin & MarcusNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hackett v. Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloyNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Fearnow v. Ridenour, Swenson, Cleere & Evans, P.C.Arizona Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Leonard & Butler, PC v. HarrisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
  4. Borteck v. RIKER, DANZIG, SCHERERSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  5. Apfel v. Budd Larner Gross Rosenbaum Greenberg & SadeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API