Tenorio v. Cronin
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson
A writ of habeas corpus was issued by the district court and after a hearing was discharged. The petitioner, Louis Tenorio, appeals. We affirm.
Only one issue exists in this extradition proceeding. The petitioner claims that the California authorities fell short in their attempts to *296extradite him because the governor did not sign the requisition documents. The documents were signed by the acting governor who was the secretary of state. The capacity of the secretary of state to act on behalf of the governor was duly authenticated. California Constitution, Article 5, Section 10 (1974). See also…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Arnold v. JustusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Ex Parte FantCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Krenwinkel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1970
- Ex Parte FuquaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Ex Parte CockburnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hershberger v. BlackSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Jaques v. BraySupreme Court of Colorado · 1982