Legal Opinion
In re Mitchum S.
New York City Family Court
Decided September 8, 1983PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Elrich A. Eastman, J.
The Division for Youth has filed a petition to extend placement. Respondent seeks dismissal of the proceeding. Both counsel have submitted memoranda on the issue of whether this petition should be dismissed because of the respondent’s unauthorized absence from his title 2 of the Executive Law placement facility. Respondent’s absence has continued beyond both the expiration date and the temporary extension thereof.
On June 4, 1982, respondent was placed for 12 months with the Division for Youth (hereinafter D.F.Y.) under title 3 of the Executive Law and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Williams v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Carr v. New York State Board of ElectionsNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- In re Beneficial Finance Co. of New York, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1964
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Clifford O.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- In re Richard B.New York City Family Court · 1990