Legal Opinion

Maicas v. Leony

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from special term, Hew York county; Andrews, Justice. Action by Anthony R. Haicas against Leon Leony for dissolution of a partnership and an accounting. From an order denying motion of defendant to appoint a referee, and granting motion of plaintiff to set aside interlocutory judgment, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtVant Brunt, P. J.

This action was brought for an accounting between ■partners. Upon consent, all the issues were referred to a referee to determine the same. Before completing the accounting, and after the parties had accounted before the referee to a certain date, the referee made his report, at the end of which he finds that an interlocutory judgment should be entered decreeing the dissolution of the partnership, and that a further accounting should be had from where he left off, and that the judgment should contain other provisions; but no form of interlocutory judgment was settled by the referee, and no…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hinds v. KelloggNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1891
  2. Seymour v. Spring Forest Cemetery Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Davis v. HoranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API