Legal Opinion

PPG Industries, Inc. v. Canal Barge Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 1977No. Civ. A. No. 72-932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

TEITELBAUM, District Judge.

Plaintiff entered into a contract with third-party defendant Ashland Oil Co. whereby Ashland agreed to transport a quantity of antifreeze liquid belonging to plaintiff from Beaumont, Texas to St. Paul, Minnesota. Pursuant to this agreement, the antifreeze was loaded into an Ashland barge and towed to Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Ashland entered into a second and separate contract with defendant Canal Barge and agreed to tow the Ashland barge containing the antifreeze from Baton Rouge to its final destination in St. Paul. Somewhere between…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clark v. BarnwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  2. Nichimen Company, Inc. v. M. v. Farland, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., and A/s Vigra, Defendants-Appellants-Appellees v. Seaboard Shipping Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  3. Interstate Steel Corporation v. SS" Crystal Gem"District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  4. Moran Towing Corporation v. M. A. Gammino Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
  5. Moran Towing Corp. v. M. A. Gammino Construction Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. EAC Timberlane v. Pisces, Ltd.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API