Legal Opinion
Gardner v. Yrttima
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 8, 2001No. 41A01-0008-JV-282PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KIRSCH, Judge.. Jeffrey Gardner appeals the trial court's denial of his petition to modify child support and presents an issue of first impression: whether an inheritance should be included in weekly gross income for purposes of determining child support obligations.
We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On February 18, 1988, C.G. was born to Gardner and Tiffany Yrttima. In December 1995, the trial court granted custody of the child to Gardner and ordered Yrttima to pay thirty dollars per week in child support. At various times since this order, Yrttima has been delinquent in paying her…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nass v. SeatonAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Crayton v. CraytonAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Kinsey v. KinseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Connell v. ConnellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Gainey v. GaineyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cody v. Evans-CodyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Lasché v. LevinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Milinovich v. WomackCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- In the Interest of P.C.S.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2010
- Crawford v. SchulteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.