Legal Opinion

In Re Osborne

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided July 28, 1994No. Bankruptcy 94-01702PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM GRANTING OBJECTION TO

AMENDMENT OF CHAPTER 13 PLAN

GEORGE C. PAINE, II, Chief Judge.

I.INTRODUCTION:

This matter comes before the court on an objection filed by King Frog Rentals to the debtors’ proposal to amend this Chapter 13 plan to add King Frog as a secured creditor. The disputed issue is whether the court should construe two rent-to-own contracts as leases or conditional sales of personal property. Applying Tennessee law, the court finds the rent-to-own contracts to be leases subject to the provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 365 of the Bankruptcy Code. The following are findings of fact…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Marhoefer Packing Company, Inc., Bankrupt, Appeal of Robert Reiser & Company, Inc., CreditorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  2. Consumer Lease Network, Inc. v. Puckett (In Re Puckett)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Olathe v. KAR Development Associates, L.P. (In Re KAR Development Associates, L.P.)District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
  2. In Re PorterfieldUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2005
  3. In Re KnowlesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2000
  4. Pacific Eastern Corp. v. Gulf Life Holding Co. (In Re Pacific Eastern Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API