Legal Opinion · Dissent

Weldon v. Asset Acceptance, LLC

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 25, 2008No. 53A01-0804-CV-159Published

1DissentBrown, Judge

I respectfully dissent. The majority holds that Weldon waived his argument that the FAA’s three-month time limit does not prevent a party from challenging the validity of the award at any time. The majority then addresses Weldon’s argument, waiver notwithstanding, and concludes that “the arbitrator properly assumed jurisdiction over the arbitration proceedings.” Op. at 1187. I disagree with the majority’s conclusions that Weldon waived his argument regarding jurisdiction and that Weldon assented to the terms of the credit agreement.

In Weldon’s appellant’s brief, he did not explicitly argue…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Exalon Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  2. Mislenkov v. Accurate Metal Detinning, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Hill v. Aro CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1967
  4. DeLorto v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1975
  5. Danner v. MBNA America Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API