Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Dunlap v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 18, 1990No. A90A1071Published

1ConcurrenceBeasley, Judge

I concur but wish to point out that the issue is whether there is an exception to the Supreme Court-fashioned rule that “upon an express stipulation of the parties that they shall be admissible, the results of a lie detector test shall be admissible as evidence for the jury to attach to them whatever probative value they may find them to have.” State v. Chambers, 240 Ga. 76 (239 SE2d 324) (1977).

Defendant urges that he should be allowed to offer the polygraph *701test results, even absent a stipulation; when he consented to undergo such a test at the State’s request without being advised in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. ChambersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Sustakovitch v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  3. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  4. Sisson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API