Legal Opinion

Bradbury v. Wainwright

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided May 10, 1982No. 80-282-Civ-J-JHMPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHN H. MOORE, II, District Judge.

This cause is before the Court upon the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff Bradbury, an inmate of the Florida penal system, contends that defendant Wainwright, Secretary of the Department of Corrections, has promulgated an administrative rule (Rule 33-3.13) that unconstitutionally deprives plaintiff of his right to marry while incarcerated.1 Defendant avers that prison inmates have no fundamental right to marry, or, alternatively, that Rule 33-3.13 is constitutional in light of the State’s compelling interest in rehabilitation and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Didley v. General Motors Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1993
  2. Bradbury v. WainwrightDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API