Bradbury v. Wainwright
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHN H. MOORE, II, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court upon the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff Bradbury, an inmate of the Florida penal system, contends that defendant Wainwright, Secretary of the Department of Corrections, has promulgated an administrative rule (Rule 33-3.13) that unconstitutionally deprives plaintiff of his right to marry while incarcerated.1 Defendant avers that prison inmates have no fundamental right to marry, or, alternatively, that Rule 33-3.13 is constitutional in light of the State’s compelling interest in rehabilitation and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Didley v. General Motors Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1993
- Bradbury v. WainwrightDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1982