Legal Opinion

City of New York v. Columbus Circle Apartments, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1961PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenry Epstein, J.

The City of New York by this action seeks to permanently enjoin and restrain the defendants from allowing and permitting the storage and hiring out of any part of the garage space in the buildings situate at 345 West 58th Street, and 30 West 60th Street, Borough of Manhattan, to transients.

*764As part of the redevelopment plan for the Columbus Circle Area an agreement was entered into between the City of New York and Columbus Circle Apartments, Inc., dated January 15, 1953, and on November 17, 1953 the land was deeded to the aforesaid corporation. The Columbus Circle Apartments, Inc., changed its…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bouton v. Litton Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  2. David K. Bouton, Arthur W. Buttenheim, Carl W. Shattuck, John C. Smaltz and G. Robert Compton, as Trustees in Liquidation of M-T Liquidation Corporation (Formerly McKiernan Corporation) (Plaintiff) v. Litton Industries, Inc., and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Defendant). Litton Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (Plaintiff) v. David K. Bouton, Arthur W. Buttenheim, Carl W. Shattuck, John C. Smaltz and G. Robert Compton, as Trustees in Liquidation of M-T Liquidation Corporation(formerly McKiernan Corporation, a Corporation of the State of New Jersey) Litton Industries, Inc., (One of the Defendants)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  3. LCB Parking Corp. v. Butterfield House, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API