Legal Opinion

Glass v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 1997No. 71781PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RHODES RUSSELL, Judge.

Wilbur Glass, Movant, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing..

On March 17, 1992, Movant entered pleas of guilty to three counts of forgery in violation of section 570.090.1, RSMo1 in Cause No. 91CR-5525, and to three additional counts vof forgery in Cause No. 91CR-5819 (hereinafter referred to as the “91 cases”). As part of the plea bargain, the State dismissed six other counts of forgery and also agreed not to issue any new charges on checks…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  3. Tolen v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Donahue v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Ferina v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Glass v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. State v. JansenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API