Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

McShann v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 8, 1930No. 122PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant was convicted of possessing a still designed and intended for the manufacture of liquor.

Error is assigned because of the refusal of the trial court to continue the cause in order that the defendant might procure the attendance of a material witness. The defendant was arrested on May 1, 1928, and tried December 3, 1928. The affidavit for continuance was filed the day of the trial. It sets out that the witness resides in Kansas City, Kan., and that defendant was without financial means to procure his attendance, and that such witness would testify that he was responsible for the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Graham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  2. Tingley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
  3. Rosenberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  4. Coon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
  5. Caldwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. George Stine Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
  2. Connolly v. MedalieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  3. Safarik v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  4. Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  5. Schnitzer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API