Legal Opinion

Green v. Scruggs

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 3, 1906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Before Townsend, J., Cherokee, July, 1905. Action by T. A. Green against Geo. D. Scruggs and M. J. Hicks. From^ circuit order reversing judgment of magistrate, plaintiff appeals. cite: 28 S. C., 258; 31 S. C., 168; 16 Misc., N. Y., 72; 37 N. Y. Supp., 663; 73 N. Y. St., 283; 5 Mich., 423; 2 Rowy. U. S., 231; 11 Fed. Cas., No. 5, 883; 7 Nat. Bank Reg., 61; 42 Mich., 119; 5 N. W., 291; 1 S. C., 129. cite: 31 S'. C., 168; 28 S. C., 258; 47 S'. C., 374; Code 1902, 3004.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

This action was brought by T. A. Green in a magistrate’s court to recover $48.58, an alleged unpaid balance on a promissory note dated August 16, 1901. When the note was given it was secured by chattel mortgage on a buggy, a wagon and a set of harness. The mortgage provided upon default this property might be sold at public auction for cash on five days’ notice, the proceeds of sale to be applied to the debt and the cost and expenses of collection, and the surplus, if any, paid to< the mortgagors. The buggy was seized and, at a sale…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. National Exchange Bank v. HolmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1889

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. HanahanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  2. Fowler v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  3. Rentz v. CrosbySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
  4. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. HanahanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  5. Rentz v. CrosbySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API